![condoms in the gay porn industry condoms in the gay porn industry](https://cbsnews1.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2010/12/08/ae46b78d-a642-11e2-a3f0-029118418759/thumbnail/620x465/4f7b4d706bb4b1e63ea7f79c4eb36664/Derrick_Burts_030.jpg)
Citing the measure as a lamentable example of ‘big government,’ the industry campaigned on the platform ‘ No on Government Waste.’ They claimed that the measure would be expensive to enforce and is unnecessary, since the industry already has in place effective STI testing procedures that prevent the spread of HIV. The primary backer of the measure, the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, argues that the measure is important for protecting “both performer and public health” from the spread of HIV, particularly in protecting performers from “workplace hazards.” Ĭonsidering that Vivid Entertainment, one of the biggest porn studios, experienced a 30 percent drop in sales during a two-year period in which it filmed with condoms, the adult film industry is unsurprisingly Measure B’s greatest opponent. Measure B, also known as the Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act amongst proponents, requires porn producers to purchase health permits from the county so that random inspections can be carried out to ensure that performers are wearing condoms. One potential issue, which was pointed out by Ars and was also one of my initial thoughts is, does Falcon Studios have to show evidence that the condoms were digitally removed? What if studios began showing no-condom scenes and claiming that they were simply well-executed instances of post-production? Once the practice becomes more common in the industry, we might have an answer.On November 6 th, while most of the world focused on the United States’ presidential election, the citizens of Los Angeles County confronted a slightly more explicit question at the voting booth: should porn performers be required to wear condoms while filming? Nearly fifty-six percent of LA county voters said yes. It’s there, but it’s not giant and distracting.” Though the process would certainly add a significant amount to a film’s budget depending on the complexity of the shoots and length of sequences, studio president Chris Ward says the goal is to “simply take the condom issue out of the viewer’s experience as much as possible while keeping our models safe. The first two films where this will be done are California Dreamin’ 1 and California Dreamin’ 2, which director Tony DiMarco aims “to capture the essence of that time, when life seemed more carefree and spontaneous.”Īrs Technica notes that Falcon Studios is most likely achieving the effect through a technique called rotoscoping, which requires going through the film frame by frame and tracing the object then applying an effect - in this case, the texture of the condom being replaced with something that resembles skin. In other words, they are essentially editing out condoms from videos. The gay porn company is now digitally removing condoms from actors through post production in films.
![condoms in the gay porn industry condoms in the gay porn industry](https://www.nydailynews.com/resizer/joYEYC6a0uQf-Eoz5d6PeM0cdrI=/1400x0/top/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-tronc.s3.amazonaws.com/public/EECZDXUTU4Y2PYG2XNTKMGUMYE.jpg)
Porn studio Falcon Studios, however, has found a way to preserve the old look before Measure B was passed and technically not violate the law. Back in 2012, Los Angeles County passed a law called Measure B that required all adult film actors to wear condoms on camera.